GNU rcs is still available as a package:
- rcs: Latest GPLv3 GNU rcs version.
- rcs57: Copy of the latest version of GNU rcs (GPLv2) from base.

Relnotes:	yes

The 1995/06/01 date is taken from the $Id$ entry in rcs.ms from RCS 5.7,
the last version we imported, and is more meaningful than the OS build
date.

Reviewed by:	eadler
Sponsored by:	The FreeBSD Foundation
Differential Revision:	https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5299

MFC after:	3 weeks
Sponsored by:	EMC / Isilon Storage Division

Rationale: ident(1) is useful out of RCS, lot of scripts are using ident(1) and
failing when base is built WITHOUT_RCS.

This version is:
- fully compatible with RCS 5.7 ident.
- fully compatible with RCS 5.9 ident.
- passes all ident test from GNU RCS 5.9 test suite

This version has support for: svn extension for the Keyword id (double colon and
# before last $)

Différences with GNU RCS ident:
- no long options as found in GNU RCS 5.9 (but not commented there).
- '-V' reports nothing but has been added for compatibility.

Differential Revision:	https://reviews.freebsd.org/D3200
Reviewed by:	pfg

Off by default, build behaves normally.
WITH_META_MODE we get auto objdir creation, the ability to
start build from anywhere in the tree.

Still need to add real targets under targets/ to build packages.

Differential Revision:       D2796
Reviewed by: brooks imp

1. 50+% of NO_PIE use is fixed by adding -fPIC to INTERNALLIB and other
   build-only utility libraries.
2. Another 40% is fixed by generating _pic.a variants of various libraries.
3. Some of the NO_PIE use is a bit absurd as it is disabling PIE (and ASLR)
   where it never would work anyhow, such as csu or loader. This suggests
   there may be better ways of adding support to the tree. Many of these
   cases can be fixed such that -fPIE will work but there is really no
   reason to have it in those cases.
4. Some of the uses are working around hacks done to some Makefiles that are
   really building libraries but have been using bsd.prog.mk because the code
   is cleaner. Had they been using bsd.lib.mk then NO_PIE would not have
   been needed.

We likely do want to enable PIE by default (opt-out) for non-tree consumers
(such as ports). For in-tree though we probably want to only enable PIE
(opt-in) for common attack targets such as remote service daemons and setuid
utilities. This is also a great performance compromise since ASLR is expected
to reduce performance. As such it does not make sense to enable it in all
utilities such as ls(1) that have little benefit to having it enabled.

Reported by:	kib

This is currently an opt-in build flag. Once ASLR support is ready and stable
it should changed to opt-out and be enabled by default along with ASLR.

Each application Makefile uses opt-out to ensure that ASLR will be enabled by
default in new directories when the system is compiled with PIE/ASLR. [2]

Mark known build failures as NO_PIE for now.

The only known runtime failure was rtld.

[1] http://www.bsdcan.org/2014/schedule/events/452.en.html
Submitted by:		Shawn Webb <lattera@gmail.com>
Discussed between:	des@ and Shawn Webb [2]