<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>src/usr.bin/patch/tests/PR74127-cline.diff, branch releng/14.0</title>
<subtitle>FreeBSD source tree</subtitle>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://cgit.freebsd.org/src/'/>
<entry>
<title>patch(1): add some basic tests</title>
<updated>2019-09-05T03:16:14+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Kyle Evans</name>
<email>kevans@FreeBSD.org</email>
</author>
<published>2019-09-05T03:16:14+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/?id=b27524973cda910697949980e95ad62e5e4be3d1'/>
<id>b27524973cda910697949980e95ad62e5e4be3d1</id>
<content type='text'>
Summary:
- basic: test application of patches created by diff -u at the
  beginning/middle/end of file, which have differing amounts of context
  before and after chunks being added
- limited_ctx: stems from PR 74127 in which a rogue line was getting added
  when the patch should have been rejected. Similar behavior was
  reproducible with larger contexts near the beginning/end of a file. See
  r326084 for details
- file_creation: patch sourced from /dev/null should create the file
- file_nodupe: said patch sourced from /dev/null shouldn't dupe the contents
  when re-applied (personal vendetta, WIP, see comment)
- file_removal: this follows from nodupe; the reverse of a patch sourced
  from /dev/null is most naturally deleting the file, as is expected based
  on GNU patch behavior (WIP)
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Summary:
- basic: test application of patches created by diff -u at the
  beginning/middle/end of file, which have differing amounts of context
  before and after chunks being added
- limited_ctx: stems from PR 74127 in which a rogue line was getting added
  when the patch should have been rejected. Similar behavior was
  reproducible with larger contexts near the beginning/end of a file. See
  r326084 for details
- file_creation: patch sourced from /dev/null should create the file
- file_nodupe: said patch sourced from /dev/null shouldn't dupe the contents
  when re-applied (personal vendetta, WIP, see comment)
- file_removal: this follows from nodupe; the reverse of a patch sourced
  from /dev/null is most naturally deleting the file, as is expected based
  on GNU patch behavior (WIP)
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
