diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/explaining-bsd/article.xml')
| -rw-r--r-- | en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/explaining-bsd/article.xml | 11 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/explaining-bsd/article.xml b/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/explaining-bsd/article.xml index 8b9dad3434..db48c4b257 100644 --- a/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/explaining-bsd/article.xml +++ b/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/explaining-bsd/article.xml @@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ the vendor of BSD/386, alleging that the product contained AT&T-copyrighted code. The case was settled out of court in 1994, but the spectre of the litigation continues to haunt people. - As recently as March 2000 an article published on the web claimed + In March 2000 an article published on the web claimed that the court case had been <quote>recently settled</quote>.</para> <para>One detail that the lawsuit did clarify is the naming: in the @@ -218,15 +218,6 @@ system</quote> and <quote>the 4.4BSD operating system</quote>.</para> </listitem> - - <listitem> - <para>There is a perception that the BSD projects are fragmented and - belligerent. The - <link xlink:href="http://interactive.wsj.com/bin/login?Tag=/&URI=/archive/retrieve.cgi%253Fid%253DSB952470579348918651.djm&">Wall Street - Journal</link> spoke of <quote>balkanization</quote> of the - BSD projects. Like the law suit, this perception bases mainly - on ancient history.</para> - </listitem> </orderedlist> </sect1> |