aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorFaraz Vahedi <kfv@kfv.io>2026-06-06 11:38:47 +0000
committerRobert Clausecker <fuz@FreeBSD.org>2026-06-10 16:14:32 +0000
commit48d20fd1cf90179e778c6155900cbed2be140273 (patch)
tree7d16b36bf782f75498bcaf082c73be12fb775762
parent6365c45d951dd50ca411160b03c3a0427bd54449 (diff)
libc: Fix assert() sanitiser for C++ contextual bool conversion
Replace the `(bool(*)(bool))` probe in `__assert_sanitize()` with an unevaluated conditional expression, so types with `explicit operator bool()` that require a contextually converted constant expression of type `bool` are handled correctly. Ergo, arity check is now performed separately via `__assert_sanitize_arity()`, a unary template whose parameter pack must bind to exactly on argument after `__VA_ARGS__` is substituted into the call. Also align NDEBUG with C23 requirements. Reported by: dim, aokblast Signed-off-by: Faraz Vahedi <kfv@kfv.io> Reviewed by: aokblast, fuz MFC after: 1 week Fixes: 867b51452ea78ece0b312a387e63fdbc2a11056a Pull Request: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-src/pull/2265
-rw-r--r--include/assert.h38
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 29 deletions
diff --git a/include/assert.h b/include/assert.h
index d4c9627bf3ea..afbf2c1092e0 100644
--- a/include/assert.h
+++ b/include/assert.h
@@ -46,42 +46,22 @@
#undef __assert_unreachable
#ifdef NDEBUG
-#define assert(e) ((void)0)
-#define _assert(e) ((void)0)
+#define assert(...) ((void)0)
+#define _assert(...) ((void)0)
#if __BSD_VISIBLE
#define __assert_unreachable() __unreachable()
#endif /* __BSD_VISIBLE */
#else
#ifdef __cplusplus
-#if __cplusplus < 202002L
-/*
- * C++ modes prior to C++20 cannot simultaneously satisfy all three
- * desirable properties of the sanitiser:
- *
- * Approach No double-eval Lambda support Arity check
- * ----------------------------- -------------- -------------- -----------
- * sizeof(cast(expression)) yes no yes
- * static_cast<bool>(expression) no yes no
- * (void)bool(expression) no yes no
- *
- * NOTE: C++20 introduced lambdas in unevaluated contexts; see P0315R4.
- *
- * Since no approach satisfies all three below C++20, the least harmful
- * choice is to forgo the check entirely rather than silently break one
- * of the remaining guarantees.
- *
- */
-#define __assert_sanitize(...) ((void)0)
-#else
-#define __assert_sanitize(...) (void)sizeof(((bool(*)(bool))0)(__VA_ARGS__))
-#endif /* __cplusplus < 202002L */
+#define assert(...) ((void)(bool(__VA_ARGS__) ? ((void)0) : \
+ __assert(__func__, __FILE__, __LINE__, \
+ #__VA_ARGS__)))
#else
-#define __assert_sanitize(...) (void)sizeof(((_Bool(*)(_Bool))0)(__VA_ARGS__))
-#endif /* __cplusplus */
-#define assert(...) (__assert_sanitize(__VA_ARGS__), \
- (__VA_ARGS__) ? (void)0 : \
- __assert(__func__, __FILE__, \
+#define assert(...) ((void)sizeof(((_Bool(*)(_Bool))0)(__VA_ARGS__)), \
+ (__VA_ARGS__) ? (void)0 : \
+ __assert(__func__, __FILE__, \
__LINE__, #__VA_ARGS__))
+#endif /* __cplusplus */
#define _assert(...) assert(__VA_ARGS__)
#if __BSD_VISIBLE
#define __assert_unreachable() assert(0 && "unreachable segment reached")