diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'contrib/sendmail/doc/changes/changes.me')
| -rw-r--r-- | contrib/sendmail/doc/changes/changes.me | 975 |
1 files changed, 975 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/contrib/sendmail/doc/changes/changes.me b/contrib/sendmail/doc/changes/changes.me new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..dbe9bea3cb89 --- /dev/null +++ b/contrib/sendmail/doc/changes/changes.me @@ -0,0 +1,975 @@ +.\" Copyright (c) 1998 Sendmail, Inc. All rights reserved. +.\" Copyright (c) 1994 Eric P. Allman. All rights reserved. +.\" Copyright (c) 1988, 1994 +.\" The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. +.\" +.\" By using this file, you agree to the terms and conditions set +.\" forth in the LICENSE file which can be found at the top level of +.\" the sendmail distribution. +.\" +.\" +.\" @(#)changes.me 8.7 (Berkeley) 5/19/98 +.\" +.\" ditroff -me -Pxx changes.me +.eh '%''Changes in Sendmail Version 8' +.oh 'Changes in Sendmail Version 8''%' +.nr si 3n +.if n .ls 2 +.+c +.(l C +.sz 14 +Changes in Sendmail Version 8* +.sz +.sp +Eric Allman +.sp 0.5 +.i +University of California, Berkeley +Mammoth Project +.)l +.(f +*An earlier version of this paper was printed in the +Proceedings of the 1994 AUUG Queensland Summer Technical Conference, +Gateway Hotel, Brisbane, March 1994. +.)f +.sp +.(l F +.ce +ABSTRACT +.sp \n(psu +Version 8 of +.i sendmail +includes a number of major changes from previous versions. +This paper gives a very short history of +.i sendmail , +a summary of the major differences between version 5 +(the last publically available version) +and version 8, +and some discussion of future directions. +.)l +.sp 2 +.pp +In 1987, the author stopped major work on +.i sendmail +due to other time committments, +only to return to active work in 1991. +This paper explores why work resumed +and what changes have been made. +.pp +Section 1 gives a short history of +.i sendmail +through version 5 and the motivation behind working on version 8. +Section 2 has +a rather detailed description of what has changed +between version 5 and version 8. +The paper finishes off with some thoughts +about what still needs to be done. +.sh 1 "HISTORY" +.pp +As discussed elsewhere, +[Allman83a, Allman83b, Allman&Amos85] +sendmail has existed in various forms since 1980. +It was released under the name +.i delivermail +in 4BSD and 4.1BSD, and as +.i sendmail +in 4.2BSD. +.\"4.0BSD delivermail 1.10 +.\"4.1BSD delivermail 1.10 +.\"4.2BSD sendmail 4.12 +.\"4.3BSD sendmail 5.52 +It quickly became the dominant mail system for networked UNIX systems. +.pp +Prior the release of 4.3BSD in November 1986, +the author had left the University for private industry, +but continued to do some work on +.i sendmail +with activity slowly trailing off +until effectively stopping after February 1987. +There was minimal support done by many people for several years, +until July of 1991 when the original author, +who had returned the University, +started active work on it again. +.pp +There were several reasons for renewed work on +.i sendmail . +There was a desire at Berkeley to convert to a subdomained structure +so that individuals were identified by their subdomain +rather than by their individual workstation; +although possible in the old code, there were some problems, +and the author was the obvious person to address them. +The Computer Systems Research Group (CSRG), +the group that produced the Berkeley Software Distributions, +was working on 4.4BSD, +and wanted an update to the mail system. +Bryan Costales was working on a book on +.i sendmail +that was being reviewed by the author, +which encouraged him to make some revisions. +And the author wanted to try to unify some of the disparate versions of +.i sendmail +that had been permitted to proliferate. +.pp +During the 1987\-91 fallow period, +many vendors and outside volunteers +had produced variants of +.i sendmail . +Perhaps the best known is the IDA version +[IDA87]. +Originally intended to be a new set of configuration files, +IDA expanded into a fairly large set of patches for the code. +Originally produced in Sweden, +IDA development passed to the University of Illinois, +and was widely used by the fairly large set of people +who prefer to get and compile their own source code +rather than use vendor-supplied binaries. +.pp +In about the same time frame, +attempts were made to clean up and extend the Simple Mail Transport Protocol +(SMTP) +[RFC821]. +This involved clarifications of some ambiguities in the protocol, +and correction of some problem areas +[RFC1123], +as well as extensions for additional functionality +(dubbed Extended Simple Mail Transport Protocol, or ESMTP) +[RFC1425, RFC1426, RFC1427] +and a richer set of semantics in the body of messages +(the Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions, a.k.a. MIME) +[RFC1521, RFC1344]. +Neither the IDA group nor most vendors +were modifying +.i sendmail +to conform to these new standards. +It seemed clear that these were ``good things'' +that should be encouraged. +However, since no one was working on a publically available version of +.i sendmail +with these updates, +they were unlikely to be widely deployed any time in the near future. +.pp +There are, of course, other mail transport agents available, +such as +.i MMDF +.\"[ref], +.i zmailer +.\"[ref], +.i smail +.\"[ref], +and +.i PP +.\"[ref]. +However, none of these seemed to be gaining the prominence of +.i sendmail ; +it appeared that most companies would not convert to another +mail transport agent any time in the forseeable future. +However, they might be persuaded to convert to a newer version of +.i sendmail . +.pp +All of these convinced the author +to work on a updated version of +.i sendmail +for public distribution. +.pp +The new version of +.i sendmail +is referred to as version eight (V8). +Versions six and seven were skipped +because of an agreement +that all files in 4.4BSD would be numbered as +.q 8.1 . +Rather than have an external version number +that differed from the file version numbers, +.i sendmail +just jumped directly to V8. +.sh 1 "CHANGES IN VERSION EIGHT" +.pp +The following is a summary of the changes between the last commonly +available version of sendmail from Berkeley (5.67) and the latest +version (8.6.6). +.pp +Many of these are ideas that had been tried in IDA, +but many of them were generalized in V8. +.sh 2 "Performance Enhancements" +.pp +Instead of closing SMTP connections immediately, open connections are +cached for possible future use. There is a limit to the number of +simultaneous open connections and the idle time of any individual +connection. +.pp +This is of best help during queue processing (since there is the +potential of many different messages going to one site), although +it can also help when processing MX records which aren't handled +by MX Piggybacking. +.pp +If two hosts with different names in a single message happen to +have the same set of MX hosts, they can be sent in the same +transaction. Version 8 notices this and tries to batch the messages. +.pp +For example, if two sites ``foo.com'' and ``bar.com'' are both +served by UUNET, they will have the same set of MX hosts and will +be sent in one transaction. UUNET will then split the message +and send it to the two individual hosts. +.sh 2 "RFC 1123 Changes" +.pp +A number of changes have been made to make sendmail ``conditionally +compliant'' (that is, it satisfies all of the MUST clauses and most +but not all of the SHOULD clauses in RFC 1123). +.pp +The major areas of change are (numbers are RFC 1123 section numbers): +.nr ii 0.75i +.ip \(sc5.2.7 +Response to RCPT command is fast. Previously, sendmail +expanded all aliases as far as it could \*- this could +take a very long time, particularly if there were +name server delays. Version 8 only checks for the +existence of an alias and does the expansion later. +It does still do a DNS lookup if there is an explicit host name +in the RCPT command, +but this time is bounded. +.ip \(sc5.2.8 +Numeric IP addresses are logged in Received: lines. +This helps tracing spoofed messages. +.ip \(sc5.2.17 +Self domain literal is properly handled. Previously, +if someone sent to user@[1.2.3.4], where 1.2.3.4 is +your IP address, the mail would probably be rejected +with a ``configuration error''. +Version 8 can handle these addresses. +.ip \(sc5.3.2 +Better control over individual timeouts. RFC 821 specified +no timeouts. Older versions of sendmail had a single +timeout, typically set to two hours. Version 8 allows +the configuration file to set timeouts for various +SMTP commands individually. +.ip \(sc5.3.3 +Error messages are sent as From:<>. This was urged by +RFC 821 and reiterated by RFC 1123, but older versions +of sendmail never really did it properly. Version 8 +does. However, some systems cannot handle this +perfectly legal address; if necessary, you can create +a special mailer that uses the `g' flag to disable this. +.ip \(sc5.3.3 +Error messages are never sent to <>. Previously, +sendmail was happy to send responses-to-responses which +sometimes resulted in responses-to-responses-to-responses +which resulted in .... you get the idea. +.ip \(sc5.3.3 +Route-addrs (the ugly ``<@hosta,@hostb:user@hostc>'' +syntax) are pruned. RFC 821 urged the use of this +bletcherous syntax. RFC 1123 has seen the light and +officially deprecates them, further urging that you +eliminate all but ``user@hostc'' should you receive +one of these things. Version 8 is slightly more generous +than the standards suggest; instead of stripping off all +the route addressees, it only strips hosts off up to +the one before the last one known to DNS, thus allowing +you to have pseudo-hosts such as foo.BITNET. The `R' +option will turn this off. +.lp +The areas in which sendmail is not ``unconditionally compliant'' are: +.ip \(sc5.2.6 +Sendmail does do header munging. +.ip \(sc5.2.10 +Sendmail doesn't always use the exact SMTP message +text from RFC 821. This is a rather silly requirement. +.ip \(sc5.3.1.1 +Sendmail doesn't guarantee only one connect for each +host on queue runs. Connection caching gives you most +of this, but it does not provide a guarantee. +.ip \(sc5.3.1.1 +Sendmail doesn't always provide an adequate limit +on concurrency. That is, there can be several +independent sendmails running at once. My feeling +is that doing an absolute limit would be a mistake +(it might result in lost mail). However, if you use +the XLA contributed software, most of this will be +guaranteed (but I don't guarantee the guarantee). +.sh 2 "Extended SMTP Support +.pp +Version 8 includes both sending and receiving support for Extended +SMTP support as defined by RFC 1425 (basic) and RFC 1427 (SIZE); +and limited support for RFC 1426 (BODY). +The body support is minimal because the +.q 8BITMIME +body type is not currently advertised. +Although such a body type will be accepted, +it will not be correctly converted to 7 bits +if speaking to a non-8-bit-MIME aware SMTP server. +.pp +.i Sendmail +tries to speak ESMTP if you have the `a' flag set +in the flags for the mailer descriptor, +or if the other end advertises the fact that it speaks ESMTP. +This is a non-standard advertisement: +.i sendmail +announces +.q "ESMTP spoken here" +during the initial connection message, +and client sendmails search for this message. +This creates some problems for some PC-based mailers, +which do not understand two-line greeting messages +as required by RFC 821. +.sh 2 "Eight-Bit Clean +.pp +Previous versions of sendmail used the 0200 bit for quoting. This +version avoids that use. +However, you can set option `7' to get seven bit stripping +for compatibility with RFC 821, +which is a 7-bit protocol. +This option says ``strip to 7 bits on input''. +.pp +Individual mailers can still produce seven bit out put using the +`7' mailer flag. +This flag says ``strip to 7 bits on output''. +.sh 2 "User Database" +.pp +The User Database (UDB) is an as-yet experimental attempt to provide +unified large-site name support. +We are installing it at Berkeley; +future versions may show significant modifications. +Briefly, UDB contains a database that is intended to contain +all the per-user information for your workgroup, +such as people's full names, their .plan information, +their outgoing mail name, and their mail drop. +.pp +The user database allows you to map both incoming and outgoing +addresses, much like IDA. However, the interface is still +better with IDA; +in particular, the alias file with incoming/outgoing marks +provides better locality of information. +.sh 2 "Improved BIND Support" +.pp +The BIND support, particularly for MX records, had a number of +annoying ``features'' which have been removed in this release. In +particular, these more tightly bind (pun intended) the name server +to sendmail, so that the name server resolution rules are incorporated +directly into sendmail. +.pp +The major change has been that the $[ ... $] operator didn't fully +qualify names that were in DNS as A or MX records. Version 8 does +this qualification. +.pp +This has proven to be an annoyance in Sun shops, +who often still run without BIND support. +However, it is really critical that this be supported, +since MX records are mandatory. +In SunOS you can choose either MX support or NIS support, +but not both. +This is fixed in Solaris, +and some +.i sendmail +support to allow this in SunOS should be forthcoming in a future release. +.sh 2 "Keyed Files" +.pp +Generalized keyed files is an idea taken directly from IDA sendmail +(albeit with a completely different implementation). +They can be useful on large sites. +.pp +Version 8 includes the following built-in map classes: +.ip dbm +Support for the ndbm(3) library. +.ip hash +Support for the ``Hash'' type from the new Berkeley db(3) library. +this library provides substantially better database support +than ndbm(3), +including in-memory caching, +arbitrarily long keys and values, +and better disk utilization. +.ip btree +Support for the ``B-Tree'' type from the new Berkeley db(3) library. +B-Trees provide better clustering than Hashed files +if you are fetching lots of records that have similar keys, +such as searching a dictionary for words beginning with ``detr''. +.ip nis +Support for NIS (a.k.a. YP) maps. +NIS+ is not supported in this version. +.ip host +Support for DNS lookups. +.ip dequote +A ``pseudo-map'' (that is, once that does not have any external data) +that allows a configuration file to break apart a quoted string +in the address. +This is necessary primarily for DECnet addresses, +which often have quoted addresses that need to be unwrapped on gateways. +.sh 2 "Multi-Word Classes & Macros in Classes" +.pp +Classes can now be multiple words. For example, +.(b +CShofmann.CS.Berkeley.EDU +.)b +allows you to match the entire string ``hofmann.CS.Berkeley.EDU'' +using the single construct ``$=S''. +.pp +Class definitions are now allowed to include macros \*- for example: +.(b +Cw$k +.)b +is legal. +.sh 2 "IDENT Protocol Support" +.pp +The IDENT protocol as defined in RFC 1413 [RFC1413] is supported. +However, many systems have a TCP/IP bug that renders this useless, +and the feature must be turned off. +Roughly, if one of these system receives a +.q "No route to host" +message (ICMP message ICMP_UNREACH_HOST) on +.i any +connection, all connections to that host are closed. +Some firewalls return this error if you try to connect +to the IDENT port, +so you can't receive email from these hosts on these systems. +It's possible that if the firewall used a more specific message +(such as ICMP_UNREACH_PROTOCOL, ICMP_UNREACH_PORT or ICMP_UNREACH_NET_PROHIB) +it would work, but this hasn't been verified. +.pp +IDENT protocol support cannot be used on +4.3BSD, +Apollo DomainOS, +Apple A/UX, +ConvexOS, +Data General DG/UX, +HP-UX, +Sequent Dynix, +or +Ultrix 4.x, x \(<= 3. +It seems to work on +4.4BSD, +IBM AIX 3.x, +OSF/1, +SGI IRIX, +Solaris, +SunOS, +and Ultrix 4.4. +.sh 2 "Separate Envelope/Header Processing +.pp +Since the From: line is passed in separately from the envelope +sender, these have both been made visible; the $g macro is set to +the envelope sender during processing of mailer argument vectors +and the header sender during processing of headers. +.pp +It is also possible to specify separate per-mailer envelope and +header processing. The SenderRWSet and RecipientRWset arguments +for mailers can be specified as ``envelope/header'' to give different +rewritings for envelope versus header addresses. +.sh 2 "Owner-List Propagates to Envelope +.pp +When an alias has an associated owner-list name, that alias is used +to change the envelope sender address. This will cause downstream +errors to be returned to that owner. +.pp +Some people find this confusing +because the envelope sender is what appears in the first +``From_'' line in UNIX messages +(that is, the line beginning ``From<space>'' +instead of ``From:''; +the latter is the header from, which +.i does +indicate the sender of the message). +In previous versions, +.i sendmail +has tried to avoid changing the envelope sender +for back compatibility with UNIX convention; +at this point that back compatibility is creating too many problems, +and it is necessary to move forward into the 1980s. +.sh 2 "Command Line Flags" +.pp +The +.b \-B +flag has been added to pass in body type information. +.pp +The +.b \-p +flag has been added to pass in protocol information +that was previously passed in by defining the +.b $r +and +.b $s +macros. +.pp +The +.b \-X +flag has been added to allow logging of all protocol in and +out of sendmail for debugging. +You can set +.q "\-X filename" +and a complete transcript will be logged in that file. +This gets big fast: the option is only for debugging. +.pp +The +.b \-q +flag can limit limit a queue run to specific recipients, +senders, or queue ids using \-qRsubstring, \-qSsubstring, or +\-qIsubstring respectively. +.sh 2 "New Configuration Line Types +.pp +The `T' (Trusted users) configuration line has been deleted. It +will still be accepted but will be ignored. +.pp +The `K' line has been added to declare database maps. +.pp +The `V' line has been added to declare the configuration version +level. +.pp +The `M' (mailer) line takes a D= field to specify execution +directory. +.sh 2 "New and Extended Options" +.pp +Several new options have been added, many to support new features, +others to allow tuning that was previously available only by +recompiling. Briefly: +.nr ii 0.5i +.ip A +The alias file specification can now be a list of alias files. +Also, the configuration can specify a class of file. +For example, to search the NIS aliases, use +.q OAnis:mail.aliases . +.ip b +Insist on a minimum number of disk blocks. +.ip C +Delivery checkpoint interval. Checkpoint the queue (to avoid +duplicate deliveries) every C addresses. +.ip E +Default error message. This message (or the contents of the +indicated file) are prepended to error messages. +.ip G +Enable GECOS matching. If you can't find a local user name +and this option is enabled, do a sequential scan of the passwd +file to match against full names. Previously a compile option. +.ip h +Maximum hop count. Previously this was compiled in. +.ip I +This option has been extended to allow setting of resolver parameters. +.ip j +Send errors in MIME-encapsulated format. +.ip J +Forward file path. Where to search for .forward files \*- defaults +to $HOME/.forward. +.ip k +Connection cache size. The total number of connections that will +be kept open at any time. +.ip K +Connection cache lifetime. The amount of time any connection +will be permitted to sit idle. +.ip l +Enable Errors-To: header. These headers violate RFC 1123; +this option is included to provide back compatibility with +old versions of sendmail. +.ip O +Incoming daemon options (e.g., use alternate SMTP port). +.ip p +Privacy options. These can be used to make your SMTP server +less friendly. +.ip r +This option has been extended to allow finer grained control +over timeouts. +For example, you can set the timeout for SMTP commands individually. +.ip R +Don't prune route-addrs. Normally, if version 8 sees an address +like "<@hostA,@hostB:user@hostC>, sendmail will try to strip off +as much as it can (up to user@hostC) as suggested by RFC 1123. +This option disables that behaviour. +.ip T +The +.q "Return To Sender" +timeout has been extended +to allow specification of a warning message interval, +typically something on the order of four hours. +If a message cannot be delivered in that interval, +a warning message is sent back to the sender +but the message continues to be tried. +.ip U +User database spec. This is still experimental. +.ip V +Fallback ``MX'' host. This can be thought of as an MX host +that applies to all addresses that has a very high preference +value (that is, use it only if everything else fails). +.ip w +If set, assume that if you are the best MX host for a host, +you should send directly to that host. This is intended +for compatibility with UIUC sendmail, and may have some +use on firewalls. +.ip 7 +Do not run eight bit clean. Technically, you have to assert +this option to be RFC 821 compatible. +.sh 2 "New Mailer Definitions" +.ip L= +Set the allowable line length. In V5, the L mailer flag implied +a line length limit of 990 characters; this is now settable to +an arbitrary value. +.ip F=a +Try to use ESMTP. It will fall back to SMTP if the initial +EHLO packet is rejected. +.ip F=b +Ensure a blank line at the end of messages. Useful on the +*file* mailer. +.ip F=c +Strip all comments from addresses; this should only be used as +a last resort when dealing with cranky mailers. +.ip F=g +Never use the null sender as the envelope sender, even when +running SMTP. This violates RFC 1123. +.ip F=7 +Strip all output to this mailer to 7 bits. +.ip F=L +Used to set the line limit to 990 bytes for SMTP compatibility. +It now does that only if the L= keyletter is not specified. +This flag is obsolete and should not be used. +.sh 2 "New or Changed Pre-Defined Macros" +.ip $k +UUCP node name from uname(2). +.ip $m +Domain part of our full hostname. +.ip $_ +RFC 1413-provided sender address. +.ip $w +Previously was sometimes the full domain name, sometimes +just the first word. Now guaranteed to be the first word +of the domain name (i.e., the host name). +.ip $j +Previously had to be defined \*- it is now predefined to be +the full domain name, if that can be determined. That is, +it is equivalent to $w.$m. +.sh 2 "New and Changed Classes" +.ip $=k +Initialized to contain $k. +.ip $=w +Now includes +.q [1.2.3.4] +(where 1.2.3.4 is your IP address) +to allow the configuration file to recognize your own IP address. +.sh 2 "New Rewriting Tokens" +.pp +The +.b $& +construct has been adopted from IDA to defer macro evaluation. +Normally, macros in rulesets are bound when the rule is first parsed +during startup. +Some macros change during processing and are uninteresting during startup. +However, that macro can be referenced using +.q $&x +to defer the evaulation of +$x +until the rule is processed. +.pp +The tokens +.b $( +and +.b $) +have been added to allow specification of map rewriting. +.pp +Version 8 allows +.b $@ +on the Left Hand Side of an `R' line to match +zero tokens. +This is intended to be used to match the null input. +.sh 2 "Bigger Defaults +.pp +Version 8 allows up to 100 rulesets instead of 30. It is recommended +that rulesets 0\-9 be reserved for sendmail's dedicated use in future +releases. +.pp +The total number of MX records that can be used has been raised to +20. +.pp +The number of queued messages that can be handled at one time has +been raised from 600 to 1000. +.sh 2 "Different Default Tuning Parameters +.pp +Version 8 has changed the default parameters for tuning queue costs +to make the number of recipients more important than the size of +the message (for small messages). This is reasonable if you are +connected with reasonably fast links. +.sh 2 "Auto-Quoting in Addresses +.pp +Previously, the ``Full Name <email address>'' syntax would generate +incorrect protocol output if ``Full Name'' had special characters +such as dot. This version puts quotes around such names. +.sh 2 "Symbolic Names On Error Mailer +.pp +Several names have been built in to the $@ portion of the $#error +mailer. For example: +.(b +$#error $@NOHOST $: Host unknown +.)b +Prints the indicated message +and sets the exit status of +.i sendmail +to +.sm EX_NOHOST . +.sh 2 "New Built-In Mailers" +.pp +Two new mailers, *file* and *include*, are included to define options +when mailing to a file or a :include: file respectively. Previously +these were overloaded on the local mailer. +.sh 2 "SMTP VRFY Doesn't Expand +.pp +Previous versions of sendmail treated VRFY and EXPN the same. In +this version, VRFY doesn't expand aliases or follow .forward files. +.pp +As an optimization, if you run with your default delivery mode +being queue-only, the RCPT command will also not chase aliases and +\&.forward files. +It will chase them when it processes the queue. +This speeds up RCPT processing. +.sh 2 "[IPC] Mailers Allow Multiple Hosts +.pp +When an address resolves to a mailer that has ``[IPC]'' as its +``Path'', the $@ part (host name) can be a colon-separated list of +hosts instead of a single hostname. This asks sendmail to search +the list for the first entry that is available exactly as though +it were an MX record. The intent is to route internal traffic +through internal networks without publishing an MX record to the +net. MX expansion is still done on the individual items. +.sh 2 "Aliases Extended" +.pp +The implementation has been merged with maps. Among other things, +this supports multiple alias files and NIS-based aliases. For +example: +.(b +OA/etc/aliases,nis:mail.aliases +.)b +will search first the local database +.q /etc/aliases +followed by the NIS map + +.sh 2 "Portability and Security Enhancements +.pp +A number of internal changes have been made to enhance portability. +.pp +Several fixes have been made to increase the paranoia factor. +.pp +In particular, the permissions required for .forward and :include: +files have been tightened up considerably. V5 would pretty much +read any file it could get to as root, which exposed some security +holes. V8 insists that all directories leading up to the .forward +or :include: file be searchable ("x" permission) by the controlling +user" (defined below), that the file itself be readable by the +controlling user, and that .forward files be owned by the user +who is being forwarded to or root. +.pp +The "controlling user" is the user on whose behalf the mail is +being delivered. For example, if you mail to "user1" then the +controlling user for ~user1/.forward and any mailers invoked +by that .forward file, including :include: files. +.pp +Previously, anyone who had a home directory could create a .forward +could forward to a program. Now, sendmail checks to make sure +that they have an "approved shell", that is, a shell listed in +the /etc/shells file. +.sh 2 "Miscellaneous Fixes and Enhancements" +.pp +A number of small bugs having to do with things like backslash-escaped +quotes inside of comments have been fixed. +.pp +The fixed size limit on header lines +(such as +.q To: +and +.q Cc: ) +has been eliminated; +those buffers are dynamically allocated now. +.pp +Sendmail writes a /etc/sendmail.pid file with the current process id +and the current invocation flags. +.pp +Two people using the same program (e.g., submit) are considered +"different" so that duplicate elimination doesn't delete one of +them. For example, two people forwarding their email to +|submit will be treated as two recipients. +.pp +The mailstats program prints mailer names and gets the location of +the sendmail.st file from /etc/sendmail.cf. +.pp +Many minor bugs have been fixed, such as handling of backslashes +inside of quotes. +.pp +A hook has been added to allow rewriting of local addresses after +aliasing. +.sh 1 "FUTURE WORK" +.pp +The previous section describes +.i sendmail +as of version 8.6.6. +There is still much to be done. +Some high points are described below. +This list is by no means exhaustive. +.sh 2 "Full MIME Support" +.pp +Currently +.i sendmail +only supports seven bit MIME messages. +Although it can pass eight bit MIME messages, +it cannot advertise that fact because the standards say +that the mail agent must be able to do 8- to 7-bit conversion +to have full 8-bit support. +This requires far more extensive modification of the message body +than is currently supported. +.pp +The best way to do this would be to support the general concept +of an external +``message filter'' +that could do arbitrary modifications of the message. +This would allow MIME conversion as well as such things as +automatic encryption of messages sent over external links. +This is probably an extremely non-trivial change. +.sh 2 "Service Switch Abstraction" +.pp +Most modern systems include some concept of a +.q "service switch" +\*- for example, to look up host names you can try +DNS, NIS, NIS+, text tables, NetInfo, +or other services in some arbitrary order. +This is currently very clumsy in +.i sendmail , +with only limited control of the services provided. +.sh 2 "More Control of Local Addresses" +.pp +Currently some addresses are declared as +.q local +and are handled specially \*- +for example, they may have .forward files, +may be translated into program calls or file deliveries, +and so forth. +These should be broken out into separate flags +to allow the local system administrator +to have more fine-grained control over operations. +.sh 2 "More Run-Time Configuration Options" +.pp +There are many options that are configured at compile time, +such as the method of file locking +and the use of the IDENT protocol +[RFC1413]. +These should be transfered to run time +by adding new options. +.pp +Similarly, some options are currently overloaded, +that is, a single option controls more than one thing. +These should probably be broken out into separate options. +.pp +This implies that options will change from single characters +to words. +.sh 2 "More Configuration Control Over Errors" +.pp +Currently, +the configuration file can generate an error message during parsing. +However, +it cannot tweak other operations, +such as issuing a warning message to the system postmaster. +Similarly, +some errors should not be triggered if they are in aliases +during an alias file rebuild, +but should be triggered if that alias is actually used. +.sh 2 "Long Term Host State" +.pp +Currently, +.i sendmail +only remembers host status during a single queue run. +This should be converted to long term status +stored on disk +so it can be shared between instantiations of +.i sendmail . +Entries will have to be timestamped +so they can time out. +This will allow +.i sendmail +to implement exponential backoff on queue runs +on a per-host basis. +.sh 2 "Connection Control" +.pp +Modern networks have different types of connectivity +than the past. +In particular, the rising prominence of dialup IP +has created certain challenges for automated servers. +It is not uncommon to try to make a connection to a host +and have it fail, even though if you tried again it would succeed. +The connection management could be a bit cleverer +to try to adapt to such situations. +.sh 2 "Other Caching" +.pp +When you do an MX record lookup, +the name server automatically returns the IP addresses +of the associated MX servers. +This information is currently ignored, +and another query is done to get this information. +It should be cached to avoid excess name server traffic. +.sh 1 "REFERENCES" +.ip [Allman83a] +.q "Sendmail \*- An Internetwork Mail Router." +E. Allman. +In +.ul +Unix Programmers's Manual, +4.2 Berkeley Software Distribution, +volume 2C. +August 1983. +.ip [Allman83b] +.q "Mail Systems and Addressing in 4.2BSD." +E. Allman +In +.ul +UNICOM Conference Proceedings. +San Diego, California. +January 1983. +.ip [Allman&Amos85] +``Sendmail Revisited.'' +E. Allman and M. Amos. +In +.ul +Usenix Summer 1985 Conference Proceedings. +Portland, Oregon. +June 1985. +.ip [IDA87] +.ul 3 +Electronic Mail Addressing in Theory and Practice +with the IDA Sendmail Enhancement Kit +(or The Postmaster's Last Will and Testament). +Lennart Lo\*:vstrand. +Department of Computer and Information Science, +University of Linko\*:ping, +Sweden, +Report no. LiTH-IDA-Ex-8715. +May 1987. +.ip [RFC821] +.ul +Simple Mail Transport Protocol. +J. Postel. +August 1982. +.ip [RFC1123] +.ul +Requirements for Internet Hosts \*- Application and Support. +Internet Engineering Task Force, +R. Braden, Editor. +October 1989. +.ip [RFC1344] +.ul +Implications of MIME for Internet Mail Gateways. +N. Borenstein. +June 1992. +.ip [RFC1413] +.ul +Identification Protocol. +M. St. Johns. +February 1993. +.ip [RFC1425] +.ul +SMTP Service Extensions. +J. Klensin, N. Freed, M. Rose, E. Stefferud, and D. Crocker. +February 1993. +.ip [RFC1426] +.ul +SMTP Service Extension for 8bit-MIMEtransport. +J. Klensin, N. Freed, M. Rose, E. Stefferud, and D. Crocker. +February 1993. +.ip [RFC1427] +.ul +SMTP Service Extension for Message Size Declaration. +J. Klensin, N. Freed, and K. Moore. +February 1993. +.ip [RFC1521] +.ul 3 +MIME (Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions) Part One: +Mechanisms for Specifying and Describing +the Format of Internet Message Bodies. +N. Borenstein and N. Freed. +September 1993. |