aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionExpander.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionExpander.cpp')
-rw-r--r--lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionExpander.cpp46
1 files changed, 44 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionExpander.cpp b/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionExpander.cpp
index 69507beeaae9..62710c5e8b84 100644
--- a/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionExpander.cpp
+++ b/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionExpander.cpp
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ Value *SCEVExpander::ReuseOrCreateCast(Value *V, Type *Ty,
// We use this precondition to produce a cast that will dominate all its
// uses. In particular, this is crucial for the case where the builder's
// insertion point *is* the point where we were asked to put the cast.
- // Since we don't know the the builder's insertion point is actually
+ // Since we don't know the builder's insertion point is actually
// where the uses will be added (only that it dominates it), we are
// not allowed to move it.
BasicBlock::iterator BIP = Builder.GetInsertPoint();
@@ -955,7 +955,8 @@ bool SCEVExpander::hoistIVInc(Instruction *IncV, Instruction *InsertPos) {
// InsertPos must itself dominate IncV so that IncV's new position satisfies
// its existing users.
- if (!SE.DT->dominates(InsertPos->getParent(), IncV->getParent()))
+ if (isa<PHINode>(InsertPos)
+ || !SE.DT->dominates(InsertPos->getParent(), IncV->getParent()))
return false;
// Check that the chain of IV operands leading back to Phi can be hoisted.
@@ -1699,3 +1700,44 @@ unsigned SCEVExpander::replaceCongruentIVs(Loop *L, const DominatorTree *DT,
}
return NumElim;
}
+
+namespace {
+// Search for a SCEV subexpression that is not safe to expand. Any expression
+// that may expand to a !isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute value is unsafe, namely
+// UDiv expressions. We don't know if the UDiv is derived from an IR divide
+// instruction, but the important thing is that we prove the denominator is
+// nonzero before expansion.
+//
+// IVUsers already checks that IV-derived expressions are safe. So this check is
+// only needed when the expression includes some subexpression that is not IV
+// derived.
+//
+// Currently, we only allow division by a nonzero constant here. If this is
+// inadequate, we could easily allow division by SCEVUnknown by using
+// ValueTracking to check isKnownNonZero().
+struct SCEVFindUnsafe {
+ bool IsUnsafe;
+
+ SCEVFindUnsafe(): IsUnsafe(false) {}
+
+ bool follow(const SCEV *S) {
+ const SCEVUDivExpr *D = dyn_cast<SCEVUDivExpr>(S);
+ if (!D)
+ return true;
+ const SCEVConstant *SC = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(D->getRHS());
+ if (SC && !SC->getValue()->isZero())
+ return true;
+ IsUnsafe = true;
+ return false;
+ }
+ bool isDone() const { return IsUnsafe; }
+};
+}
+
+namespace llvm {
+bool isSafeToExpand(const SCEV *S) {
+ SCEVFindUnsafe Search;
+ visitAll(S, Search);
+ return !Search.IsUnsafe;
+}
+}