diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'test/CodeGen/MIR')
| -rw-r--r-- | test/CodeGen/MIR/Generic/branch-probabilities.ll | 28 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | test/CodeGen/MIR/X86/auto-successor.mir | 61 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | test/CodeGen/MIR/X86/branch-probabilities.mir | 18 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | test/CodeGen/MIR/X86/successor-basic-blocks.mir | 1 |
4 files changed, 79 insertions, 29 deletions
diff --git a/test/CodeGen/MIR/Generic/branch-probabilities.ll b/test/CodeGen/MIR/Generic/branch-probabilities.ll deleted file mode 100644 index 8d119316b134..000000000000 --- a/test/CodeGen/MIR/Generic/branch-probabilities.ll +++ /dev/null @@ -1,28 +0,0 @@ -; RUN: llc -stop-after machine-sink %s -o %t.mir -; RUN: FileCheck %s < %t.mir -; RUN: llc %t.mir -run-pass machine-sink -; Check that branch probabilities are printed in a format that can then be parsed. -; This test fails on powerpc because of an undefined physical register use in the MIR. See PR31062. -; XFAIL: powerpc - -declare void @foo() -declare void @bar() - -define void @test(i1 %c) { -; CHECK-LABEL: name: test -entry: - br i1 %c, label %then, label %else - -then: - call void @foo() - br label %end -; CHECK: successors: %{{[a-z0-9\-\.]+}}({{0x[0-9a-f]+}}), %{{[a-z0-9\-\.]+}}({{0x[0-9a-f]+}}) - -else: - call void @bar() - br label %end -; CHECK: successors: %{{[a-z0-9\-\.]+}}({{0x[0-9a-f]+}}) - -end: - ret void -} diff --git a/test/CodeGen/MIR/X86/auto-successor.mir b/test/CodeGen/MIR/X86/auto-successor.mir new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..23b4f91b3b60 --- /dev/null +++ b/test/CodeGen/MIR/X86/auto-successor.mir @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@ +# RUN: llc -mtriple=x86_64-- -o - %s -run-pass=none -verify-machineinstrs -simplify-mir | FileCheck %s +--- +# We shouldn't need any explicit successor lists in these examples +# CHECK-LABEL: name: func0 +# CHECK: bb.0: +# CHECK-NOT: successors +# CHECK: JE_1 %bb.1, implicit undef %eflags +# CHECK: JMP_1 %bb.3 +# CHECK: bb.1: +# CHECK-NOT: successors +# CHECK: bb.2: +# CHECK-NOT: successors +# CHECK: JE_1 %bb.1, implicit undef %eflags +# CHECK: bb.3: +# CHECK: RETQ undef %eax +name: func0 +body: | + bb.0: + JE_1 %bb.1, implicit undef %eflags + JMP_1 %bb.3 + + bb.1: + + bb.2: + JE_1 %bb.1, implicit undef %eflags + + bb.3: + JE_1 %bb.4, implicit undef %eflags ; condjump+fallthrough to same block + + bb.4: + RETQ undef %eax +... +--- +# Some cases that need explicit successors: +# CHECK-LABEL: name: func1 +name: func1 +body: | + bb.0: + ; CHECK: bb.0: + ; CHECK: successors: %bb.3, %bb.1 + successors: %bb.3, %bb.1 ; different order than operands + JE_1 %bb.1, implicit undef %eflags + JMP_1 %bb.3 + + bb.1: + ; CHECK: bb.1: + ; CHECK: successors: %bb.2, %bb.1 + successors: %bb.2, %bb.1 ; different order (fallthrough variant) + JE_1 %bb.1, implicit undef %eflags + + bb.2: + ; CHECK: bb.2: + ; CHECK: successors: %bb.1(0x60000000), %bb.3(0x20000000) + successors: %bb.1(3), %bb.3(1) ; branch probabilities not normalized + JE_1 %bb.1, implicit undef %eflags + + bb.3: + ; CHECK: bb.3: + ; CHECK: RETQ undef %eax + RETQ undef %eax +... diff --git a/test/CodeGen/MIR/X86/branch-probabilities.mir b/test/CodeGen/MIR/X86/branch-probabilities.mir new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..4aacd2d5cef1 --- /dev/null +++ b/test/CodeGen/MIR/X86/branch-probabilities.mir @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +# RUN: llc -o - %s -mtriple=x86_64-- -run-pass=none | FileCheck %s +--- +# Check that branch probabilities are printed correctly as hex numbers. +# CHECK-LABEL: name: test +# CHECK: bb.0: +# CHECK-NEXT: successors: %bb.1(0x66666666), %bb.2(0x1999999a) +name: test +body: | + bb.0: + successors: %bb.1(4), %bb.2(1) + JE_1 %bb.2, implicit undef %eflags + + bb.1: + NOOP + + bb.2: + RETQ undef %eax +... diff --git a/test/CodeGen/MIR/X86/successor-basic-blocks.mir b/test/CodeGen/MIR/X86/successor-basic-blocks.mir index 395272bb23c0..ffeb04af9e40 100644 --- a/test/CodeGen/MIR/X86/successor-basic-blocks.mir +++ b/test/CodeGen/MIR/X86/successor-basic-blocks.mir @@ -32,7 +32,6 @@ name: foo body: | ; CHECK-LABEL: bb.0.entry: - ; CHECK: successors: %bb.1.less(0x40000000), %bb.2.exit(0x40000000) ; CHECK-LABEL: bb.1.less: bb.0.entry: successors: %bb.1.less, %bb.2.exit |
