aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tests/bug-2803/bug-2803.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'tests/bug-2803/bug-2803.c')
-rw-r--r--tests/bug-2803/bug-2803.c123
1 files changed, 123 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tests/bug-2803/bug-2803.c b/tests/bug-2803/bug-2803.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..4ee6f02532a1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/bug-2803/bug-2803.c
@@ -0,0 +1,123 @@
+#include <config.h>
+
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <sys/time.h>
+
+#include <ntp_fp.h>
+#include <timevalops.h>
+
+#include "unity.h"
+//#include "bug-2803.h"
+
+/* microseconds per second */
+#define MICROSECONDS 1000000
+
+int simpleTest(void);
+void setUp(void);
+void tearDown(void);
+//void test_main(void);
+
+static int verbose = 1; // if not 0, also print results if test passed
+static int exit_on_err = 0; // if not 0, exit if test failed
+
+
+/*
+ * Test function calling the old and new code mentioned in
+ * http://bugs.ntp.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2803#c22
+ */
+static int do_test( struct timeval timetv, struct timeval tvlast )
+{
+ struct timeval tvdiff_old;
+ struct timeval tvdiff_new;
+
+ int cond_old;
+ int cond_new;
+ int failed;
+
+ cond_old = 0;
+ cond_new = 0;
+
+ // Here is the old code:
+ tvdiff_old = abs_tval(sub_tval(timetv, tvlast));
+ if (tvdiff_old.tv_sec > 0) {
+ cond_old = 1;
+ }
+
+ // Here is the new code:
+ tvdiff_new = sub_tval(timetv, tvlast);
+ if (tvdiff_new.tv_sec != 0) {
+ cond_new = 1;
+ }
+
+ failed = cond_new != cond_old;
+
+ if ( failed || verbose )
+ printf( "timetv %lli|%07li, tvlast %lli|%07li: tvdiff_old: %lli|%07li -> %i, tvdiff_new: %lli|%07li -> %i, same cond: %s\n",
+ (long long) timetv.tv_sec, timetv.tv_usec,
+ (long long) tvlast.tv_sec, tvlast.tv_usec,
+ (long long) tvdiff_old.tv_sec, tvdiff_old.tv_usec, cond_old,
+ (long long) tvdiff_new.tv_sec, tvdiff_new.tv_usec, cond_new,
+ failed ? "NO <<" : "yes" );
+
+ return failed ? -1 : 0;
+}
+
+
+
+/*
+ * Call the test function in a loop for a given set of parameters.
+ * Both timetv and tvlast iterate over the given range, in all combinations.
+ */
+static
+int test_loop( long long start_sec, long start_usec,
+ long long stop_sec, long stop_usec,
+ long long step_sec, long step_usec )
+{
+ struct timeval timetv;
+ struct timeval tvlast;
+
+ for ( timetv.tv_sec = start_sec; timetv.tv_sec <= stop_sec; timetv.tv_sec += step_sec )
+ for ( timetv.tv_usec = start_usec; timetv.tv_usec <= stop_usec; timetv.tv_usec += step_usec )
+ for ( tvlast.tv_sec = start_sec; tvlast.tv_sec <= stop_sec; tvlast.tv_sec += step_sec )
+ for ( tvlast.tv_usec = start_usec; tvlast.tv_usec <= stop_usec; tvlast.tv_usec += step_usec )
+ {
+ int rc = do_test( timetv, tvlast );
+ if (rc < 0 && exit_on_err )
+ return rc;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+
+
+int simpleTest( void )
+{
+ int x;
+ // loop from {0.0} to {1.1000000} stepping by tv_sec by 1 and tv_usec by 100000
+ x = test_loop( 0, 0, 1, MICROSECONDS, 1, MICROSECONDS / 10 );
+
+ // x = test_loop( 0, 0, 5, MICROSECONDS, 1, MICROSECONDS / 1000 );
+ // x = test_loop( 0, 0, -5, -MICROSECONDS, -1, -MICROSECONDS / 1000 );
+
+ return x;
+}
+
+
+
+
+
+void setUp(void)
+{
+
+}
+
+void tearDown(void)
+{
+}
+
+
+void test_main( void )
+{
+ TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(0, simpleTest());
+}