diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'www/upcoming_meeting.html')
| -rw-r--r-- | www/upcoming_meeting.html | 4 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/www/upcoming_meeting.html b/www/upcoming_meeting.html index c7bd83fb39ca..f1a99fdef2d8 100644 --- a/www/upcoming_meeting.html +++ b/www/upcoming_meeting.html @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2597">2597</a></td><td>std::log misspecified for complex numbers</td><td>Toronto</td><td></td></tr> <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2783">2783</a></td><td>stack::emplace() and queue::emplace() should return decltype(auto)</td><td>Toronto</td><td></td></tr> <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2932">2932</a></td><td>Constraints on parallel algorithm implementations are underspecified</td><td>Toronto</td><td></td></tr> - <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2937">2937</a></td><td>Is equivalent("existing_thing", "not_existing_thing") an error?</td><td>Toronto</td><td></td></tr> + <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2937">2937</a></td><td>Is equivalent("existing_thing", "not_existing_thing") an error?</td><td>Toronto</td><td>Complete</td></tr> <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2940">2940</a></td><td>result_of specification also needs a little cleanup</td><td>Toronto</td><td></td></tr> <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2942">2942</a></td><td>LWG 2873's resolution missed weak_ptr::owner_before</td><td>Toronto</td><td></td></tr> <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2954">2954</a></td><td>Specialization of the convenience variable templates should be prohibited</td><td>Toronto</td><td></td></tr> @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ <li>2597 - I think we do this already; probably needs tests</li> <li>2783 - should be easy to change; needs tests</li> <li>2932 - We're not doing the parallel algorithms yet.</li> -<li>2937 - file system; Eric?</li> +<li>2937 - Implemented with tests. The PR LGTM (Eric)</li> <li>2940 - We haven't implemented result_of yet, but I don't think that this will require any changes.</li> <li>2942 - all of our owner_before overloads are already noexcept; just need to update the tests.</li> <li>2954 - I don't think there's anything to do here.</li> |