Update summary Bugzilla standard format for ports

PR:		docs/232816
Submitted by:	salvadore
Reviewed by:	ygy
Differential:	https://reviews.freebsd.org/D23590

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/documentation/content/en/books/porters-handbook/quick-porting/chapter.adoc b/documentation/content/en/books/porters-handbook/quick-porting/chapter.adoc
index f8f3789e54..48d0cef894 100644
--- a/documentation/content/en/books/porters-handbook/quick-porting/chapter.adoc
+++ b/documentation/content/en/books/porters-handbook/quick-porting/chapter.adoc
@@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ Submit [.filename]#oneko.diff# with the https://bugs.freebsd.org/submit/[bug sub
 
 [NOTE]
 ====
-Giving a good description in the summary of the problem report makes the work of port committers a lot easier. We prefer something like "New port: _category/portname short description of the port_" for new ports. Using this scheme makes it easier and faster to begin the work of committing the new port.
+Giving a good description in the summary of the problem report makes the work of port committers and triagers a lot easier. The expected format for new ports is "[NEW PORT] _category/portname short description of the port_" for new ports. Using this scheme makes it easier and faster to begin the work of committing the new port.
 ====
 
 After submitting the port, please be patient. The time needed to include a new port in FreeBSD can vary from a few days to a few months. A simple search form of the Problem Report database can be searched at https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/query.cgi[].