aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorKyle Evans <kevans@FreeBSD.org>2023-03-01 06:04:49 +0000
committerKyle Evans <kevans@FreeBSD.org>2023-03-01 06:04:49 +0000
commit8dff0b6761407357c5bb42ee799c5c9f465557a3 (patch)
tree2d91b5077dc75c908b86d2b318d5aae1c1a95ac4
parentdc6df546be29a468ae21b1b7604e85b703ad6779 (diff)
downloadsrc-8dff0b6761407357c5bb42ee799c5c9f465557a3.tar.gz
src-8dff0b6761407357c5bb42ee799c5c9f465557a3.zip
efifb: add a tunable to select the framebuffer cache attribute
Mapping the framebuffer with WC (Write Combined) memory type can, in practice, cause some memory transactions to be rate-limited at a fraction of the fb write rate. WC allows one core to queue up many globally visible write transactions, and in the process some unrelated transactions may end up having to wait for all of the queued up PCI writes to be flushed. Add an hw.efifb.cache_attr tunable to allow mapping the framebuffer as uncacheable instead. We should likely be taking a more careful approach of checking the memory map to determine which cacheability attributes are feasible, but the knob lets us use our historically functional behavior while offering a convenient way to switch on a stock kernel. The only valid values for hw.efifb.cache_attr at this time are "uc" and "wc". Original patch by Marc De La Gueronniere <mdelagueronniere@verisign.com> along with previous testing. Reviewed by: imp MFC after: 1 week Sponsored by: Verisign, Inc. Sponsored by: Klara, Inc. Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17884
-rw-r--r--sys/dev/vt/hw/efifb/efifb.c27
1 files changed, 26 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/sys/dev/vt/hw/efifb/efifb.c b/sys/dev/vt/hw/efifb/efifb.c
index b30b1d29e205..1d243599e70c 100644
--- a/sys/dev/vt/hw/efifb/efifb.c
+++ b/sys/dev/vt/hw/efifb/efifb.c
@@ -103,7 +103,32 @@ vt_efifb_init(struct vt_device *vd)
struct fb_info *info;
struct efi_fb *efifb;
caddr_t kmdp;
+ int memattr;
int roff, goff, boff;
+ char attr[16];
+
+ /*
+ * XXX TODO: I think there's more nuance here than we're acknowledging,
+ * and we should look into it. It may be that the framebuffer lives in
+ * a segment of memory that doesn't support one or both of these. We
+ * should likely be consulting the memory map for any applicable
+ * cacheability attributes before making a final decision.
+ */
+ memattr = VM_MEMATTR_WRITE_COMBINING;
+ if (TUNABLE_STR_FETCH("hw.efifb.cache_attr", attr, sizeof(attr))) {
+ /*
+ * We'll allow WC but it's currently the default, UC is the only
+ * other tested one at this time.
+ */
+ if (strcasecmp(attr, "wc") != 0 &&
+ strcasecmp(attr, "uc") != 0) {
+ printf("efifb: unsupported cache attr specified: %s\n",
+ attr);
+ printf("efifb: expected \"wc\" or \"uc\"\n");
+ } else if (strcasecmp(attr, "uc") == 0) {
+ memattr = VM_MEMATTR_UNCACHEABLE;
+ }
+ }
info = vd->vd_softc;
if (info == NULL)
@@ -141,7 +166,7 @@ vt_efifb_init(struct vt_device *vd)
info->fb_size = info->fb_height * info->fb_stride;
info->fb_pbase = efifb->fb_addr;
info->fb_vbase = (intptr_t)pmap_mapdev_attr(info->fb_pbase,
- info->fb_size, VM_MEMATTR_WRITE_COMBINING);
+ info->fb_size, memattr);
vt_fb_init(vd);