loader: lua: assume late ACPI detection if the feature isn't enabled

While we're here, enable the feature in the places we detect ACPI.  This
lets us side-step the existing issues and provide a path forward for
folks upgrading from previous releases that haven't updated their ESP
yet.

Let's also fix core.setACPI: the hint already indicates that the
user's disabled it more consistently than loader.acpi_disabled_by_user.
Even more, the latter is wrong because we set it by default if we did
not detect ACPI.  The ACPI hint remains even when we're setting defaults
because ACPI loaded into the kernel will make some noise if it's not
hinted off, even when we didn't detect it.

imp notes that this will result in some relatively harmless noise on
platforms that don't support ACPI but aren't using the UEFI loader, as
we would enable the ACPI module for loading on them and then loader
would not be able to find it.  These are non-fatal, but should probably
be fixed by just declaring support for EARLY_ACPI in those loaders since
we know they won't have ACPI early on -- punting on this for the time
being, though, in favor of providing a safer upgrade path sooner.

Reviewed by:	imp
Differential Revision:	https://reviews.freebsd.org/D42727

3 files changed, 14 insertions, 10 deletions

diff --git a/stand/efi/loader/main.c b/stand/efi/loader/main.c
index d6ba7ec3da44..23894d832e5e 100644
--- a/stand/efi/loader/main.c
+++ b/stand/efi/loader/main.c
@@ -909,6 +909,7 @@ acpi_detect(void)
 	char buf[24];
 	int revision;
 
+	feature_enable(FEATURE_EARLY_ACPI);
 	if ((rsdp = efi_get_table(&acpi20)) == NULL)
 		if ((rsdp = efi_get_table(&acpi)) == NULL)
 			return;
diff --git a/stand/i386/libi386/biosacpi.c b/stand/i386/libi386/biosacpi.c
index f94e8684c970..fcad64d81549 100644
--- a/stand/i386/libi386/biosacpi.c
+++ b/stand/i386/libi386/biosacpi.c
@@ -54,6 +54,8 @@ biosacpi_detect(void)
     char		buf[24];
     int			revision;
 
+    feature_enable(FEATURE_EARLY_ACPI);
+
     /* locate and validate the RSDP */
     if ((rsdp = biosacpi_find_rsdp()) == NULL)
 	return;
diff --git a/stand/lua/core.lua b/stand/lua/core.lua
index 3a80b0822ca6..c7581b296b8f 100644
--- a/stand/lua/core.lua
+++ b/stand/lua/core.lua
@@ -133,17 +133,20 @@ function core.setSingleUser(single_user)
 end
 
 function core.hasACPI()
-	return loader.getenv("acpi.rsdp") ~= nil
-end
+	-- We can't trust acpi.rsdp to be set if the loader binary doesn't do
+	-- ACPI detection early enough.  UEFI loader historically didn't, so
+	-- we'll fallback to assuming ACPI is enabled if this binary does not
+	-- declare that it probes for ACPI early enough
+	if loader.getenv("acpi.rsdp") ~= nil then
+		return true
+	end
 
-function core.isX86()
-	return loader.machine_arch == "i386" or loader.machine_arch == "amd64"
+	return not core.hasFeature("EARLY_ACPI")
 end
 
 function core.getACPI()
 	if not core.hasACPI() then
-		-- x86 requires ACPI pretty much
-		return false or core.isX86()
+		return false
 	end
 
 	-- Otherwise, respect disabled if it's set
@@ -157,13 +160,11 @@ function core.setACPI(acpi)
 	end
 
 	if acpi then
-		loader.setenv("acpi_load", "YES")
+		config.enableModule("acpi")
 		loader.setenv("hint.acpi.0.disabled", "0")
-		loader.unsetenv("loader.acpi_disabled_by_user")
 	else
-		loader.unsetenv("acpi_load")
+		config.disableModule("acpi")
 		loader.setenv("hint.acpi.0.disabled", "1")
-		loader.setenv("loader.acpi_disabled_by_user", "1")
 	end
 	core.acpi = acpi
 end