| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
... | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Submitted by: Thomas Gellekum <tg@melaten.rwth-aachen.de>
Notes:
svn path=/head/; revision=26463
|
|
|
|
| |
Notes:
svn path=/head/; revision=21570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
proper dependency info.
Note that this port still doesn't build right (it needs to use ${MOTIFLIB}
instead of -lXm).
Notes:
svn path=/head/; revision=21567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Prompted by PR: 13476, 13477
Submitted by: KATO Tsuguru
Notes:
svn path=/head/; revision=21157
|
|
|
|
| |
Notes:
svn path=/head/; revision=20951
|
|
|
|
| |
Notes:
svn path=/head/; revision=16378
|
|
|
|
| |
Notes:
svn path=/head/; revision=14930
|
|
|
|
| |
Notes:
svn path=/head/; revision=13649
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
By the way, I see that this ports uses HAVE_MOTIF to turn on Motif
support, but I don't see any patches. Does this port follow our
guidelines for Motif support (MOTIFLIB and all)? In particular,
what happens if you build a package on a machine with HAVE_MOTIF
and MOTIF_STATIC defined if you have both shared and static libXm?
Notes:
svn path=/head/; revision=11539
|
|
to allow me to view the output of Spice graphics.
Notes:
svn path=/head/; revision=11473
|