diff options
author | Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> | 2017-01-02 19:18:08 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> | 2017-01-02 19:18:08 +0000 |
commit | bab175ec4b075c8076ba14c762900392533f6ee4 (patch) | |
tree | 01f4f29419a2cb10abe13c1e63cd2a66068b0137 /lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/ConversionChecker.cpp | |
parent | 8b7a8012d223fac5d17d16a66bb39168a9a1dfc0 (diff) | |
download | src-bab175ec4b075c8076ba14c762900392533f6ee4.tar.gz src-bab175ec4b075c8076ba14c762900392533f6ee4.zip |
Vendor import of clang trunk r290819:vendor/clang/clang-trunk-r290819
Notes
Notes:
svn path=/vendor/clang/dist/; revision=311118
svn path=/vendor/clang/clang-trunk-r290819/; revision=311119; tag=vendor/clang/clang-trunk-r290819
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/ConversionChecker.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/ConversionChecker.cpp | 192 |
1 files changed, 192 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/ConversionChecker.cpp b/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/ConversionChecker.cpp new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..2bb9e858731c --- /dev/null +++ b/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/ConversionChecker.cpp @@ -0,0 +1,192 @@ +//=== ConversionChecker.cpp -------------------------------------*- C++ -*-===// +// +// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure +// +// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source +// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details. +// +//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// +// +// Check that there is no loss of sign/precision in assignments, comparisons +// and multiplications. +// +// ConversionChecker uses path sensitive analysis to determine possible values +// of expressions. A warning is reported when: +// * a negative value is implicitly converted to an unsigned value in an +// assignment, comparison or multiplication. +// * assignment / initialization when source value is greater than the max +// value of target +// +// Many compilers and tools have similar checks that are based on semantic +// analysis. Those checks are sound but have poor precision. ConversionChecker +// is an alternative to those checks. +// +//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// +#include "ClangSACheckers.h" +#include "clang/AST/ParentMap.h" +#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/BugReporter/BugType.h" +#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/Checker.h" +#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/CheckerManager.h" +#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/CheckerContext.h" + +using namespace clang; +using namespace ento; + +namespace { +class ConversionChecker : public Checker<check::PreStmt<ImplicitCastExpr>> { +public: + void checkPreStmt(const ImplicitCastExpr *Cast, CheckerContext &C) const; + +private: + mutable std::unique_ptr<BuiltinBug> BT; + + // Is there loss of precision + bool isLossOfPrecision(const ImplicitCastExpr *Cast, CheckerContext &C) const; + + // Is there loss of sign + bool isLossOfSign(const ImplicitCastExpr *Cast, CheckerContext &C) const; + + void reportBug(ExplodedNode *N, CheckerContext &C, const char Msg[]) const; +}; +} + +void ConversionChecker::checkPreStmt(const ImplicitCastExpr *Cast, + CheckerContext &C) const { + // TODO: For now we only warn about DeclRefExpr, to avoid noise. Warn for + // calculations also. + if (!isa<DeclRefExpr>(Cast->IgnoreParenImpCasts())) + return; + + // Don't warn for loss of sign/precision in macros. + if (Cast->getExprLoc().isMacroID()) + return; + + // Get Parent. + const ParentMap &PM = C.getLocationContext()->getParentMap(); + const Stmt *Parent = PM.getParent(Cast); + if (!Parent) + return; + + bool LossOfSign = false; + bool LossOfPrecision = false; + + // Loss of sign/precision in binary operation. + if (const auto *B = dyn_cast<BinaryOperator>(Parent)) { + BinaryOperator::Opcode Opc = B->getOpcode(); + if (Opc == BO_Assign || Opc == BO_AddAssign || Opc == BO_SubAssign || + Opc == BO_MulAssign) { + LossOfSign = isLossOfSign(Cast, C); + LossOfPrecision = isLossOfPrecision(Cast, C); + } else if (B->isRelationalOp() || B->isMultiplicativeOp()) { + LossOfSign = isLossOfSign(Cast, C); + } + } else if (isa<DeclStmt>(Parent)) { + LossOfSign = isLossOfSign(Cast, C); + LossOfPrecision = isLossOfPrecision(Cast, C); + } + + if (LossOfSign || LossOfPrecision) { + // Generate an error node. + ExplodedNode *N = C.generateNonFatalErrorNode(C.getState()); + if (!N) + return; + if (LossOfSign) + reportBug(N, C, "Loss of sign in implicit conversion"); + if (LossOfPrecision) + reportBug(N, C, "Loss of precision in implicit conversion"); + } +} + +void ConversionChecker::reportBug(ExplodedNode *N, CheckerContext &C, + const char Msg[]) const { + if (!BT) + BT.reset( + new BuiltinBug(this, "Conversion", "Possible loss of sign/precision.")); + + // Generate a report for this bug. + auto R = llvm::make_unique<BugReport>(*BT, Msg, N); + C.emitReport(std::move(R)); +} + +// Is E value greater or equal than Val? +static bool isGreaterEqual(CheckerContext &C, const Expr *E, + unsigned long long Val) { + ProgramStateRef State = C.getState(); + SVal EVal = C.getSVal(E); + if (EVal.isUnknownOrUndef() || !EVal.getAs<NonLoc>()) + return false; + + SValBuilder &Bldr = C.getSValBuilder(); + DefinedSVal V = Bldr.makeIntVal(Val, C.getASTContext().LongLongTy); + + // Is DefinedEVal greater or equal with V? + SVal GE = Bldr.evalBinOp(State, BO_GE, EVal, V, Bldr.getConditionType()); + if (GE.isUnknownOrUndef()) + return false; + ConstraintManager &CM = C.getConstraintManager(); + ProgramStateRef StGE, StLT; + std::tie(StGE, StLT) = CM.assumeDual(State, GE.castAs<DefinedSVal>()); + return StGE && !StLT; +} + +// Is E value negative? +static bool isNegative(CheckerContext &C, const Expr *E) { + ProgramStateRef State = C.getState(); + SVal EVal = State->getSVal(E, C.getLocationContext()); + if (EVal.isUnknownOrUndef() || !EVal.getAs<NonLoc>()) + return false; + DefinedSVal DefinedEVal = EVal.castAs<DefinedSVal>(); + + SValBuilder &Bldr = C.getSValBuilder(); + DefinedSVal V = Bldr.makeIntVal(0, false); + + SVal LT = + Bldr.evalBinOp(State, BO_LT, DefinedEVal, V, Bldr.getConditionType()); + + // Is E value greater than MaxVal? + ConstraintManager &CM = C.getConstraintManager(); + ProgramStateRef StNegative, StPositive; + std::tie(StNegative, StPositive) = + CM.assumeDual(State, LT.castAs<DefinedSVal>()); + + return StNegative && !StPositive; +} + +bool ConversionChecker::isLossOfPrecision(const ImplicitCastExpr *Cast, + CheckerContext &C) const { + // Don't warn about explicit loss of precision. + if (Cast->isEvaluatable(C.getASTContext())) + return false; + + QualType CastType = Cast->getType(); + QualType SubType = Cast->IgnoreParenImpCasts()->getType(); + + if (!CastType->isIntegerType() || !SubType->isIntegerType()) + return false; + + if (C.getASTContext().getIntWidth(CastType) >= + C.getASTContext().getIntWidth(SubType)) + return false; + + unsigned W = C.getASTContext().getIntWidth(CastType); + if (W == 1 || W >= 64U) + return false; + + unsigned long long MaxVal = 1ULL << W; + return isGreaterEqual(C, Cast->getSubExpr(), MaxVal); +} + +bool ConversionChecker::isLossOfSign(const ImplicitCastExpr *Cast, + CheckerContext &C) const { + QualType CastType = Cast->getType(); + QualType SubType = Cast->IgnoreParenImpCasts()->getType(); + + if (!CastType->isUnsignedIntegerType() || !SubType->isSignedIntegerType()) + return false; + + return isNegative(C, Cast->getSubExpr()); +} + +void ento::registerConversionChecker(CheckerManager &mgr) { + mgr.registerChecker<ConversionChecker>(); +} |