aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/sys/kern/vfs_cache.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMateusz Guzik <mjg@FreeBSD.org>2020-10-16 00:56:13 +0000
committerMateusz Guzik <mjg@FreeBSD.org>2020-10-16 00:56:13 +0000
commite7602e04c7c0aee4fe9dbba3c8a03927cdedba3e (patch)
tree228df3e9b96492756641982c901dfce5236fceaa /sys/kern/vfs_cache.c
parent571bc3d1af2c25f7bd931fc77fe0e3dfd1a0580e (diff)
downloadsrc-e7602e04c7c0aee4fe9dbba3c8a03927cdedba3e.tar.gz
src-e7602e04c7c0aee4fe9dbba3c8a03927cdedba3e.zip
cache: support negative entry promotion in slowpath smr
Notes
Notes: svn path=/head/; revision=366743
Diffstat (limited to 'sys/kern/vfs_cache.c')
-rw-r--r--sys/kern/vfs_cache.c183
1 files changed, 100 insertions, 83 deletions
diff --git a/sys/kern/vfs_cache.c b/sys/kern/vfs_cache.c
index d402f7757ca8..2d0d9a000c40 100644
--- a/sys/kern/vfs_cache.c
+++ b/sys/kern/vfs_cache.c
@@ -806,6 +806,9 @@ cache_negative_init(struct namecache *ncp)
ns->neg_flag = 0;
}
+/*
+ * Move a negative entry to the hot list.
+ */
static void
cache_negative_promote(struct namecache *ncp)
{
@@ -823,6 +826,87 @@ cache_negative_promote(struct namecache *ncp)
}
}
+/*
+ * Move a negative entry to the hot list if it matches the lookup.
+ *
+ * We have to take locks, but they may be contended and in the worst
+ * case we may need to go off CPU. We don't want to spin within the
+ * smr section and we can't block with it. Exiting the section means
+ * the found entry could have been evicted. We are going to look it
+ * up again.
+ */
+static bool
+cache_negative_promote_cond(struct vnode *dvp, struct componentname *cnp,
+ struct namecache *oncp, uint32_t hash)
+{
+ struct namecache *ncp;
+ struct neglist *nl;
+ u_char nc_flag;
+
+ nl = NCP2NEGLIST(oncp);
+
+ mtx_lock(&nl->nl_lock);
+ /*
+ * For hash iteration.
+ */
+ vfs_smr_enter();
+
+ /*
+ * Avoid all surprises by only succeeding if we got the same entry and
+ * bailing completely otherwise.
+ * XXX There are no provisions to keep the vnode around, meaning we may
+ * end up promoting a negative entry for a *new* vnode and returning
+ * ENOENT on its account. This is the error we want to return anyway
+ * and promotion is harmless.
+ *
+ * In particular at this point there can be a new ncp which matches the
+ * search but hashes to a different neglist.
+ */
+ CK_SLIST_FOREACH(ncp, (NCHHASH(hash)), nc_hash) {
+ if (ncp == oncp)
+ break;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * No match to begin with.
+ */
+ if (__predict_false(ncp == NULL)) {
+ goto out_abort;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * The newly found entry may be something different...
+ */
+ if (!(ncp->nc_dvp == dvp && ncp->nc_nlen == cnp->cn_namelen &&
+ !bcmp(ncp->nc_name, cnp->cn_nameptr, ncp->nc_nlen))) {
+ goto out_abort;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * ... and not even negative.
+ */
+ nc_flag = atomic_load_char(&ncp->nc_flag);
+ if ((nc_flag & NCF_NEGATIVE) == 0) {
+ goto out_abort;
+ }
+
+ if (__predict_false(!cache_ncp_canuse(ncp))) {
+ goto out_abort;
+ }
+
+ cache_negative_promote(ncp);
+
+ SDT_PROBE2(vfs, namecache, lookup, hit__negative, dvp, ncp->nc_name);
+ counter_u64_add(numneghits, 1);
+ vfs_smr_exit();
+ mtx_unlock(&nl->nl_lock);
+ return (true);
+out_abort:
+ vfs_smr_exit();
+ mtx_unlock(&nl->nl_lock);
+ return (false);
+}
+
static void
cache_negative_hit(struct namecache *ncp)
{
@@ -1455,7 +1539,7 @@ cache_lookup(struct vnode *dvp, struct vnode **vpp, struct componentname *cnp,
uint32_t hash;
enum vgetstate vs;
int error;
- bool whiteout;
+ bool whiteout, neg_hot;
u_short nc_flag;
MPASS((tsp == NULL && ticksp == NULL) || (tsp != NULL && ticksp != NULL));
@@ -1532,21 +1616,23 @@ negative_success:
}
}
- SDT_PROBE2(vfs, namecache, lookup, hit__negative, dvp, ncp->nc_name);
cache_out_ts(ncp, tsp, ticksp);
- counter_u64_add(numneghits, 1);
whiteout = (ncp->nc_flag & NCF_WHITE);
- /*
- * TODO: We need to take locks to promote an entry. Code doing it
- * in SMR lookup can be modified to be shared.
- */
ns = NCP2NEGSTATE(ncp);
- if ((ns->neg_flag & NEG_HOT) == 0 ||
- !cache_ncp_canuse(ncp)) {
+ neg_hot = ((ns->neg_flag & NEG_HOT) != 0);
+ if (__predict_false(!cache_ncp_canuse(ncp))) {
vfs_smr_exit();
goto out_fallback;
}
- vfs_smr_exit();
+ if (neg_hot) {
+ vfs_smr_exit();
+ if (!cache_negative_promote_cond(dvp, cnp, ncp, hash))
+ goto out_fallback;
+ } else {
+ SDT_PROBE2(vfs, namecache, lookup, hit__negative, dvp, ncp->nc_name);
+ counter_u64_add(numneghits, 1);
+ vfs_smr_exit();
+ }
if (whiteout)
cnp->cn_flags |= ISWHITEOUT;
return (ENOENT);
@@ -3373,90 +3459,21 @@ cache_fplookup_vnode_supported(struct vnode *vp)
return (vp->v_type != VLNK);
}
-/*
- * Move a negative entry to the hot list.
- *
- * We have to take locks, but they may be contended and in the worst
- * case we may need to go off CPU. We don't want to spin within the
- * smr section and we can't block with it. Instead we are going to
- * look up the entry again.
- */
static int __noinline
cache_fplookup_negative_promote(struct cache_fpl *fpl, struct namecache *oncp,
uint32_t hash)
{
struct componentname *cnp;
- struct namecache *ncp;
- struct neglist *nl;
struct vnode *dvp;
- u_char nc_flag;
cnp = fpl->cnp;
dvp = fpl->dvp;
- nl = NCP2NEGLIST(oncp);
cache_fpl_smr_exit(fpl);
-
- mtx_lock(&nl->nl_lock);
- /*
- * For hash iteration.
- */
- cache_fpl_smr_enter(fpl);
-
- /*
- * Avoid all surprises by only succeeding if we got the same entry and
- * bailing completely otherwise.
- * XXX There are no provisions to keep the vnode around, meaning we may
- * end up promoting a negative entry for a *new* vnode and returning
- * ENOENT on its account. This is the error we want to return anyway
- * and promotion is harmless.
- *
- * In particular at this point there can be a new ncp which matches the
- * search but hashes to a different neglist.
- */
- CK_SLIST_FOREACH(ncp, (NCHHASH(hash)), nc_hash) {
- if (ncp == oncp)
- break;
- }
-
- /*
- * No match to begin with.
- */
- if (__predict_false(ncp == NULL)) {
- goto out_abort;
- }
-
- /*
- * The newly found entry may be something different...
- */
- if (!(ncp->nc_dvp == dvp && ncp->nc_nlen == cnp->cn_namelen &&
- !bcmp(ncp->nc_name, cnp->cn_nameptr, ncp->nc_nlen))) {
- goto out_abort;
- }
-
- /*
- * ... and not even negative.
- */
- nc_flag = atomic_load_char(&ncp->nc_flag);
- if ((nc_flag & NCF_NEGATIVE) == 0) {
- goto out_abort;
- }
-
- if (__predict_false(!cache_ncp_canuse(ncp))) {
- goto out_abort;
- }
-
- cache_negative_promote(ncp);
-
- SDT_PROBE2(vfs, namecache, lookup, hit__negative, dvp, ncp->nc_name);
- counter_u64_add(numneghits, 1);
- cache_fpl_smr_exit(fpl);
- mtx_unlock(&nl->nl_lock);
- return (cache_fpl_handled(fpl, ENOENT));
-out_abort:
- cache_fpl_smr_exit(fpl);
- mtx_unlock(&nl->nl_lock);
- return (cache_fpl_aborted(fpl));
+ if (cache_negative_promote_cond(dvp, cnp, oncp, hash))
+ return (cache_fpl_handled(fpl, ENOENT));
+ else
+ return (cache_fpl_aborted(fpl));
}
/*