src - FreeBSD source tree

	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Age	Files	Lines
*	rc tests: Add a test to check for warnings from rcorder	Mark Johnston	2025-10-08	1	-0/+12
\| \| \| \| \| \|	Reviewed by: des MFC after: 2 weeks Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D52954
*	rc.subr: Drop duplicate SPDX tag in test script	Dag-Erling Smørgrav	2025-08-01	1	-2/+0
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	I added a tag in the correct place in the previous commit, and somehow managed to miss that there was already one in the wrong place. Fixes: 7f04c09fe745 Sponsored by: Klara, Inc. Sponsored by: NetApp, Inc.
*	rc.subr: Fix wait_for_pids	Dag-Erling Smørgrav	2025-08-01	1	-0/+27
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	It looks like this function was intended to loop and print an update whenever at least one of the waited-for processes terminates. However, the default behavior of pwait is to block until none of the watched processes exist. Use pwait -o instead so it only blocks until at least one process terminates, and add a test. Sponsored by: Klara, Inc. Sponsored by: NetApp, Inc. Reviewed by: siderop1_netapp.com, kevans Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D51691
*	rc_subr_test: Bump some sleep timeouts	Mark Johnston	2025-07-13	1	-2/+2
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	The test verifies that the rc framework will OOM-protect a process spawned by rc. It just wraps a 5-second /bin/sleep invocation as part of this test. The rc framework uses procctl to set the OOM-protect bit after the process has started, i.e., it uses procctl -p. So, with a 5 second timeout, it's possible for the process to exit before procctl actually runs, if the system is heavily loaded. (I see this failure occasionally with KMSAN configured and many tests running in parallel.) Bump the timeout to reduce the risk of this happening. The timeout value is arbitrary since the test will stop the rc process, i.e., we don't have to wait for 60 seconds to elapse before the test passes. MFC after: 1 week
*	rc/tests: Fix process flags checks using ps(1)	Olivier Certner	2025-05-07	1	-2/+2
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	These checks use ps(1) with both the '-p' and '-a' flags, which worked so far as ps(1)'s '-a' option was buggy. Since the fix in commit "ps(1): Make '-a' and '-A' always show all processes" (93a94ce731a89b56), such a command-line always selects all processes, making the specified '-p' useless and the test wrong. Remove the useless '-a'. While here, remove the redundant '-x', as '-p' implies '-x' by default. MFC after: 1 day Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D50201
*	rc/tests: Skip oomprotect tests in a jail	Mateusz Piotrowski	2024-10-14	1	-0/+8
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	oomprotect cannot be used in a jail. Reviewed by: bnovkov, christos, markj Approved by: bnovkov (mentor), christos (mentor), markj (mentor) MFC after: 1 week
*	spdx: The BSD-2-Clause-FreeBSD identifier is obsolete, drop -FreeBSD	Warner Losh	2023-05-12	1	-1/+1
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	The SPDX folks have obsoleted the BSD-2-Clause-FreeBSD identifier. Catch up to that fact and revert to their recommended match of BSD-2-Clause. Discussed with: pfg MFC After: 3 days Sponsored by: Netflix
*	rc: Start testing the rc(8) framework (beginning with *_oomprotect)	Mateusz Piotrowski	2022-07-26	2	-0/+106
	This change adds 2 tests to make sure that the *_oomprotect variable sets the protection against OOM killer properly within rc(8) scripts. This is also adding the first tests for the rc(8) framework. More tests will be added as we go. PR: 256148 Approved by: des MFC after: 2 weeks Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D35745